SHARE THIS PAGE 

THE LONDON SOUND SURVEY BLOG | COMMENTS

Occasional posts on subjects like field recording, London sounds past and present, other websites worth looking at, articles in the press, and news of sound-related events.

The Audio Technica BP4025: your reliable stereo workhorse

Posted by IMR on 14 November 2010

ONCE IN A while a comment or an email arrives asking whether the Audio Technica BP4025 mic is any good. I’ve used it to make a number of recordings and can recommend it as a reliable and versatile workhorse.

The BP4025 is a single-point stereo mic which runs on 48V phantom power and, in Britain, should cost less than £450 new. Its main plus points are good build quality, quite a spacious-sounding stereo image, and low self-noise.

The first thing you’ll notice about the mic is that it has a solid, sturdy feel. The BP4025 is just over 7 inches or 18 cm long, and weighs 9.5 oz or 269 g. Its weight, build and business-like black finish challenge you to get some work done.

Audio Technica BP4025 stereo mic


The BP4025 uses large-diaphragm capsules set in a coincident X/Y pattern at a mutual angle of 160°, rather greater than that used by other coincident X/Y stereo mics such as the Rode NT4. Here’s what the capsules look like minus their protective grille:

Audio Technica BP4025 large-diaphragm capsules


Despite the two diaphragms being almost back-to-back with one another, the mic avoids producing a hole in the centre of the stereo image. How does it do it?

1. Sound pressure waves propagated through the air impact on the electrostatically-charged diaphragms. 2. Then a miracle occurs. 3. The resulting electrical signal reaches your recorder’s A-D converter.

If only I knew how to be more explicit about stage 2. Instead, here are a couple of dawn chorus recordings to give you an idea of the mic’s performance outdoors. The first was made in October before last in Abbey Wood, south-east London:


The next recording was made in April this year in the woods at Sydenham Hill. The mic was positioned on a tripod stand with an embankment about ten metres behind it, so the birdsong (and peacock shriek, but that’s another story) that you’ll hear was mostly in front and to the sides of the mic.


The large diaphragms enable the BP4025 to have a low stated self-noise level of 14dB. Rob Danielson, who contributes regularly and very helpfully to the naturerecordists Yahoo Group and who knows a lot about recording, reckons the true level could even be slightly lower. This recording was made in a cramped passage in the Chislehurst caves and there’s no noticeable hiss in the brief silences between drips:


The BP4025 puts plenty of oomph into the lower frequencies similar to an omnidirectional mic. Traffic rumble can sound very prominent in urban recordings if you don’t use the built-in roll-off switch. I’m pretty sure I didn’t bother with the roll-off for this recording of an automatic car wash going through its cycle:


The BP4025 fits inside a Rode blimp without any difficulty. But because the mic is head-heavy, it’s a good idea not to walk around for too long with it fixed inside the blimp, otherwise it can sometimes work its way loose of the suspension.

I’ve had the pleasure of listening to some very beautiful recordings made by skillful and experienced recordists using more expensive microphones. The BP4025 isn’t in the same league as a pair of spaced Sennheiser MKH20s, or a mid-side array using Schoeps mics. But you can take it anywhere and for what it costs it’s excellent value for money.

Thanks for this; it is very useful to read about your experience with different microphones and this is a useful, no-nonsense guide to equipment.

Cheers!

Posted by Felix on 15 November 2010

Very complete and indeed interesting test. Could be a alternative to a more expensive pair of AT4022 mics solution. Thank you.

Posted by serge on 27 November 2010

Has anyone done loud recordings with this mic, like firearms, race cars, etc? Thanks.

Posted by Watson Wu on 31 December 2010

Hello Watson,

The BP4025 has quite a high maximum sound pressure level, somewhere in the 140dBs, with a pad to add an extra 10dB to that.

Even so, there have been two situations where the mic has been overwhelmed by very loud sounds close by. One occasion was in a church bell tower, actually in the same room as the bells, when someone began ringing one of the bells.

If it’s too loud, you’re too close!

Posted by IMR on 11 January 2011

Thanks for info, I appreciate it.

Which recorder did you use during the church bell session? For stereo I use my Sound Devices 702, which has an incredible limiter.

I may end up buying this same mic to replace my Rode NT4. I like the Rode but it’s too heavy for field recordings (when I have to carry it in my blimp/hand grip).

Posted by Watson Wu on 11 January 2011

It was a Fostex FR-2LE. The bell rang for some time, so I had the chance to turn the gain right down, but it did no good. It really was shockingly loud in there, I’m very glad I had closed-back headphones on.

Posted by IMR on 11 January 2011

I have the regular Fostex FR-2. I use it for quieter recordings. If needed as an additional, I use Shure mic pads so the recorder won’t freak out as much. This Shure mic pads can cut up to -25db. This has been a blessing for loud race cars, guns, and impacts.

For loud recordings I also recommend the Remote Audio HN-7506 headphones. It’s The Best for monitoring super loud sessions, like guns. grin

Posted by Watson Wu on 12 January 2011